Automation index
How much of a Miller’s job can AI already do?
A mill diagram comes earlier. Regular flour without scorching the grain do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Miller
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#366 / 653
View rankingMiller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Wheat, moisture and the diagram.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Mill, sift and the one that heats.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Quality, ash and the baker who complains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Cleaning, pests and the silo.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The harvest, the batch and not mixing the wet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Regular flour, and not scorching the grain.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- mill wheat
- sift
- grain moisture
- ash
- silos
- mill pests
- mill diagrams
- flour batches
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9021.00· ESCO/ISCO 8160
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131