Automation index
How much of a Miner’s job can AI already do?
A blast plan and a log come earlier. Going down, drilling, and coming out alive do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Miner
16%
AI can already do 16% of this job.
#626 / 653
View rankingMiner
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Logs, blast plans and sensors.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Logged maintenance and mine CMMS.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 22% | +3.1 |
Drill, load and extract.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 10% | +2.4 |
Support, ventilation and water.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Safety, gases and evacuation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 10% | +1.6 |
Shift, partner and not getting casual.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 16% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Logs, blast plans and sensors
- Logged maintenance and mine CMMS
- Drill, load and extract
- Support, ventilation and water
- Safety, gases and evacuation
- Shift, partner and not getting casual
- minero
- miner
- interior de mina
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-5041.00· ESCO/ISCO 8111
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131