Automation index
How much of a Mixer-truck driver’s job can AI already do?
A route and a slump come earlier. Arriving fresh and pouring without blocking the pump do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Mixer-truck driver
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#426 / 653
View rankingMixer-truck driver
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Order, mix and mixing time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Drive, site and the tight access.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Pour, pump and the one who wants more water.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Wash, leftovers and not leaving a hard drum.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The jam, the delay and the concrete that sets.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Arrive fresh, and not adding extra water.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- drive mixers
- batch
- pour concrete
- wash the drum
- slump
- concrete pump
- mix order
- site access
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-3032.00· ESCO/ISCO 8332
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211