Automation index
How much of a Mixer-truck driver’s job can AI already do?
A route and a slump come earlier. Arriving fresh and pouring without blocking the pump do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Mixer-truck driver
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#412 / 633
View rankingMixer-truck driver
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Order, mix and mixing time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Drive, site and the tight access.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Pour, pump and the one who wants more water.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Wash, leftovers and not leaving a hard drum.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The jam, the delay and the concrete that sets.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Arrive fresh, and not adding extra water.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- drive mixers
- batch
- pour concrete
- wash the drum
- slump
- concrete pump
- mix order
- site access
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-3032.00· ESCO/ISCO 8332
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142