Automation index
How much of a Mobile developer’s job can AI already do?
A layout and a store listing come earlier. It not crashing on a real phone do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Mobile developer
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#92 / 643
View rankingMobile developer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Screens, API and offline state.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Store review, crashlytics and ANRs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Real device, the notch and fragmented Android.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
CI, tests and the week's release.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Product, the redesign and not breaking what people use.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not crash, and not ignoring the one-star.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- build apps
- ship to stores
- crashlytics
- offline state
- ANRs
- mobile tests
- fragmented Android
- store review
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1252.00· ESCO/ISCO 2514
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131