Automation index
How much of a Mobile developer’s job can AI already do?
A layout and a store listing come earlier. It not crashing on a real phone do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Mobile developer
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#92 / 643
View rankingMobile developer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Screens, API and offline state.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Store review, crashlytics and ANRs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Real device, the notch and fragmented Android.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
CI, tests and the week's release.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Product, the redesign and not breaking what people use.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not crash, and not ignoring the one-star.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- build apps
- ship to stores
- crashlytics
- offline state
- ANRs
- mobile tests
- fragmented Android
- store review
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1252.00· ESCO/ISCO 2514
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211