Automation index
How much of a Motion designer’s job can AI already do?
A template and an easing come earlier. Motion that tells, and does not nauseate, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Motion designer
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#252 / 643
View rankingMotion designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Storyboard, easing and the brand template.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
After Effects, the render and the client who changes the end.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Rhythm, type and cutting to tempo.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Delivery, formats and the one that is too heavy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Art direction and not recycling the same whoosh.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it tells, and not nauseating with extra easing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- motion graphics
- easing
- motion storyboard
- type in motion
- renders
- cut to tempo
- brand templates
- delivery formats
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-1014.00· ESCO/ISCO 2166
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131