Automation index
How much of a Mountain guide’s job can AI already do?
An avalanche report comes earlier. Taking the group and coming down whole do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Mountain guide
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#498 / 633
View rankingMountain guide
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Report, route and the kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Walk, pace and the one who drops.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Ground, snow and the yes or no to go on.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Bivouac, the surprise and not improvising anchors.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the ego and not pushing the summit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Come down whole, and not trusting the report alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- avalanche reports
- mountain routes
- group pace
- bivouac
- anchors
- ground
- summit
- mountain kit
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-7011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5113
IS WORK OVER?
Actuary
32%
#25 / 633
View rankingActuary
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Run models, reserves and sensitivities.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 55% | +13.2 |
Draft technical reports and memos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Choose assumptions, tables and criteria.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Explain to the board and the supervisor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 15% | +2.4 |
Validate data quality and bias.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
Signed opinion and professional liability.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 12% | 18% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 32% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Run models, reserves and sensitivities
- Draft technical reports and memos
- Choose assumptions, tables and criteria
- Explain to the board and the supervisor
- Validate data quality and bias
- Signed opinion and professional liability
- actuario
- actuary
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2120