Automation index
How much of a Mountain guide’s job can AI already do?
An avalanche report comes earlier. Taking the group and coming down whole do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Mountain guide
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#567 / 713
View rankingMountain guide
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Report, route and the kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Walk, pace and the one who drops.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Ground, snow and the yes or no to go on.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Bivouac, the surprise and not improvising anchors.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the ego and not pushing the summit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Come down whole, and not trusting the report alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- avalanche reports
- mountain routes
- group pace
- bivouac
- anchors
- ground
- summit
- mountain kit
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-7011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5113
IS WORK OVER?
Instructional designer
27%
#158 / 713
View rankingInstructional designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Aim, the storyboard and the module.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pilot, the learner and what is not understood.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Activity, the feedback and not putting a silly test.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
LMS, the figure and not inflating completion.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the deadline and not cutting the practice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they learn, and not leaving the empty video.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- course storyboard
- modules
- learner pilot
- activities
- LMS
- completion
- feedback
- not a silly test
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351