Automation index
How much of a Music teacher’s job can AI already do?
A score comes earlier. Sounding together without hating the instrument do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Music teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#370 / 633
View rankingMusic teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Score, tuning and the term plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Class, the one out of tune and the one who does not practise.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Rehearsal, the concert and the one who is ill.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Assess, auditions and not humiliating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Families, the instrument and the one that will not fit at home.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Sound together, and not hating the instrument.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scores
- tune
- concert rehearsals
- auditions
- instrument lessons
- out of tune
- families
- term plan
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2354
IS WORK OVER?
Commercial diver
18%
#555 / 633
View rankingCommercial diver
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, tables and the day’s gas.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Bottom, tool and the one who snags.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 6% | +1.4 |
Comms, the tender and stopping in time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Inspection, wet weld or cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Current, zero vis and not losing the buddy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 18% | +2.5 |
Come up whole, and not skipping decompression.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 10% | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dive plan
- decompression tables
- wet weld
- tender
- zero vis
- underwater cut
- dive gas
- the bottom
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-9092.00· ESCO/ISCO 7541