Automation index
How much of a Music therapist’s job can AI already do?
A playlist comes earlier. Something sounding and moving what will not come in words do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Music therapist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#367 / 653
View rankingMusic therapist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Session, aims and the instrument.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Patient, the silence and not forcing the song.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Group, the one who shuts and the one who overflows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the marker and not selling miracles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The ward, the noise and not bothering the rest.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Let it sound, and move what will not come out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- music-therapy sessions
- instruments
- therapy groups
- silence
- markers
- the ward
- not force the song
- not sell miracles
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1129.00· ESCO/ISCO 2269
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211