Automation index
How much of a National police officer’s job can AI already do?
A case file comes earlier. Identifying the one who ran without planting evidence do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
National police officer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#629 / 743
View rankingNational police officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
File, steps and the deadline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Street, ID and the one who runs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Home, the entry and not overstepping.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Statement, the lawyer and not pushing extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The judge, the warrant and not planting anything.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Identify, and not planting evidence.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- case files
- ID checks
- entries and searches
- steps
- warrants
- statements
- not plant evidence
- deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 33-3051.00· ESCO/ISCO 5412
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141