IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Nature guide’s job can AI already do?

A species card comes earlier. Actually looking without leaving litter do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Nature guide

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Route, species and the group.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Field, the one who will not quiet and the one who lags.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Weather, the path and aborting.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Interpret, not reciting and the one who asks.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Capacity, the nest and not getting too close.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they look, and not leaving litter.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • nature routes
  • species
  • interpret
  • nests
  • capacity
  • paths
  • field groups
  • litter

Sources for this job· O*NET 39-7012.00· ESCO/ISCO 5113

Spanish language teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • text commentary
  • writing
  • speaking
  • spelling
  • language rubrics
  • plagiarism
  • paragraphs
  • reading

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 348Paediatric physiotherapist22%
  2. 349Greengrocer22%
  3. 350Geriatrician22%
  4. 352Ice-cream maker22%
  5. 353Hydrologist22%
  6. 354Agronomist22%