Automation index
How much of a Naval architect’s job can AI already do?
A stability calc comes earlier. A ship that floats and does not break does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Naval architect
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#240 / 633
View rankingNaval architect
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Stability, strength and hull forms.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Drawings, specs and class rules.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Yard, sea trials and owner.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Systems, machinery and onboard safety.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Rules, IMO and documentation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Sign a hull that will not break.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- building plans
- renders
- sign a project
- Stability, strength and hull forms
- Drawings, specs and class rules
- Yard, sea trials and owner
- Systems, machinery and onboard safety
- Rules, IMO and documentation
- Sign a hull that will not break
- ingeniero naval
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2144
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 633
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263