IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a NGO programme officer’s job can AI already do?

A report and an indicator come earlier. The project existing outside the slide deck do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

NGO programme officer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Design, indicators and the report.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%48%+7.7
Justify, invoices and the donor.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%16%+2.9
Partners, meetings and coordination.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That it works, and not inflating the indicator.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%14%+2.2
Total100%26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • design projects
  • justify to donors
  • indicators
  • activity report
  • coordinate partners
  • timetable
  • project invoices
  • neighbourhood work

Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635

Instructional designer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Aim, the storyboard and the module.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Pilot, the learner and what is not understood.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Activity, the feedback and not putting a silly test.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
LMS, the figure and not inflating completion.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The client, the deadline and not cutting the practice.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That they learn, and not leaving the empty video.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • course storyboard
  • modules
  • learner pilot
  • activities
  • LMS
  • completion
  • feedback
  • not a silly test

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 234Copywriter26%
  2. 235Last-mile manager26%
  3. 236Development cooperation officer26%
  4. 238Lathe operator26%
  5. 239Archivist25%
  6. 240Boilermaker25%