Automation index
How much of a NGO programme officer’s job can AI already do?
A report and an indicator come earlier. The project existing outside the slide deck do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
NGO programme officer
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#229 / 693
View rankingNGO programme officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Design, indicators and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Justify, invoices and the donor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Partners, meetings and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it works, and not inflating the indicator.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- design projects
- justify to donors
- indicators
- activity report
- coordinate partners
- timetable
- project invoices
- neighbourhood work
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
School psychologist
22%
#413 / 693
View rankingSchool psychologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Referral, tests and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The child, the session and the one who will not talk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Classroom, the teacher and what actually happens.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, the fear and not scaring.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The bullying protocol and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
See the child, and not hanging a label.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- school reports
- sessions with children
- psychological tests
- bullying protocol
- the family
- real classroom
- not label
- the tutor's referral
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2634