IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a NGO programme officer’s job can AI already do?

A report and an indicator come earlier. The project existing outside the slide deck do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

NGO programme officer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Design, indicators and the report.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%48%+7.7
Justify, invoices and the donor.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%16%+2.9
Partners, meetings and coordination.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That it works, and not inflating the indicator.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%14%+2.2
Total100%26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • design projects
  • justify to donors
  • indicators
  • activity report
  • coordinate partners
  • timetable
  • project invoices
  • neighbourhood work

Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635

Secondary teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Unit, criteria and the exam.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Classroom, the group and the one who blows it up.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Cover, the corridor and the fight.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Family, the report and not giving a 5 for quiet.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Staff, inspection and not dressing it.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they work, and nobody left out.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • unit plans
  • assessment criteria
  • secondary cover
  • corridors
  • the report
  • staff meeting
  • schools inspection
  • behaviour

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 220Copywriter26%
  2. 221Last-mile manager26%
  3. 222Development cooperation officer26%
  4. 224Lathe operator26%
  5. 225Archivist25%
  6. 226Boilermaker25%