Automation index
How much of a NGO programme officer’s job can AI already do?
A report and an indicator come earlier. The project existing outside the slide deck do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
NGO programme officer
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#237 / 703
View rankingNGO programme officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Design, indicators and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Justify, invoices and the donor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Partners, meetings and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it works, and not inflating the indicator.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- design projects
- justify to donors
- indicators
- activity report
- coordinate partners
- timetable
- project invoices
- neighbourhood work
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Tax lawyer
27%
#131 / 703
View rankingTax lawyer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Assessment, the file and the appeal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Inspection, the minute and not lying about the fact.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
TEAR, the hearing and the precedent.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Constitutional, the one that will not fly and not selling it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the saving and not building a dodge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Fight it, and not signing what will not be swallowed.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tax appeals
- assessments
- inspection minutes
- TEAR
- precedents
- tax dodges
- the tax office
- facts
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2611