Automation index
How much of a Nuclear medicine physician’s job can AI already do?
A PET and a stock report come earlier. Dosing the isotope and reading the patient do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Nuclear medicine physician
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#168 / 623
View rankingNuclear medicine physician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
PET, SPECT protocols and a stock report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Order dose, timing and preparation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Give the isotope and watch the reaction.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Clinic, the cancer that returns and the family.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quality, waste and radiation protection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Signing the study and the dose you cannot repeat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- report PET
- SPECT
- dose isotopes
- nuclear medicine
- radiation protection
- PET protocols
- give radiopharmaceuticals
- nuclear oncology clinic
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1224.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 623
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165