Automation index
How much of a Nuclear medicine physician’s job can AI already do?
A PET and a stock report come earlier. Dosing the isotope and reading the patient do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Nuclear medicine physician
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#171 / 643
View rankingNuclear medicine physician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
PET, SPECT protocols and a stock report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Order dose, timing and preparation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Give the isotope and watch the reaction.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Clinic, the cancer that returns and the family.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quality, waste and radiation protection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Signing the study and the dose you cannot repeat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- report PET
- SPECT
- dose isotopes
- nuclear medicine
- radiation protection
- PET protocols
- give radiopharmaceuticals
- nuclear oncology clinic
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1224.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131