Automation index

How much of a Nuclear medicine physician’s job can AI already do?

A PET and a stock report come earlier. Dosing the isotope and reading the patient do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

27%

AI can already do 27% of this job.

#168 / 633

Nuclear medicine physician

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
PET, SPECT protocols and a stock report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	52%	+9.4
Order dose, timing and preparation. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Give the isotope and watch the reaction. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Clinic, the cancer that returns and the family. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Quality, waste and radiation protection. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Signing the study and the dose you cannot repeat. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

29%

#57 / 633

Criminologist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Data, maps and the victimisation report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Police, judges and the measure under debate. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low