Automation index

How much of a Nuclear medicine physician’s job can AI already do?

A PET and a stock report come earlier. Dosing the isotope and reading the patient do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

27%

AI can already do 27% of this job.

#174 / 673

Nuclear medicine physician

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
PET, SPECT protocols and a stock report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	52%	+9.4
Order dose, timing and preparation. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Give the isotope and watch the reaction. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Clinic, the cancer that returns and the family. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Quality, waste and radiation protection. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Signing the study and the dose you cannot repeat. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low