Automation index
How much of a Nuclear medicine technologist’s job can AI already do?
A dose comes earlier. Injecting the isotope without contaminating the rest do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Nuclear medicine technologist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#578 / 673
View rankingNuclear medicine technologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Dose, calibrate and the patient.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Inject, the vein and the one who moves.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Acquisition, the SPECT and the artefact.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Protection, the area and not contaminating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The nuclear physician, the image and not repeating extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Inject, and not contaminating the rest.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- isotopes
- calibrate doses
- SPECT
- radiopharmaceutical injection
- radiation protection
- contamination
- acquisition
- artefacts
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2033.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211
IS WORK OVER?
Secondary teacher
22%
#395 / 673
View rankingSecondary teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Unit, criteria and the exam.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, the group and the one who blows it up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Cover, the corridor and the fight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, the report and not giving a 5 for quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, inspection and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they work, and nobody left out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- unit plans
- assessment criteria
- secondary cover
- corridors
- the report
- staff meeting
- schools inspection
- behaviour
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330