Automation index
How much of a Occupational physician’s job can AI already do?
A screening protocol comes earlier. Calling fit or not and facing the company do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Occupational physician
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#65 / 643
View rankingOccupational physician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Screenings, protocols and the work history.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Fit notes, restrictions and PPE.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The hard case, the one who cannot, and the company pushing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Risk surveillance, sick leave and return.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Inspectorate, mutual and coordination with H&S.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Medical secrecy and signing fit for work.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 29% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- occupational screening
- fit for work
- health surveillance
- work restrictions
- return to work
- occupational medicine
- work history
- medical secrecy
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1229.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#186 / 643
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262