Automation index
How much of a Oceanographer’s job can AI already do?
A current model comes earlier. Going to sea and actually reading the water do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Oceanographer
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#369 / 653
View rankingOceanographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, buoys and the cruise.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Sea, sampling and the one who misses the cast.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Data, the gap and not interpolating extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the coast and the one who will not hear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The storm, the ship and aborting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Read the water, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- current models
- buoys
- ocean cruises
- sampling
- interpolation
- the coast
- the storm
- casts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-2042.00· ESCO/ISCO 2114
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131