Automation index
How much of a Office manager’s job can AI already do?
An office inventory comes earlier. The house working without running out of paper do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Office manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#173 / 643
View rankingOffice manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Vendors, contracts and the inventory.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Facilities, the air-con and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Onboarding, keys and the desk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Budget, the extra and not overspending.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Management, the surprise and not leaving the office dark.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it works, and not running out of paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- office inventory
- facilities
- onboarding
- vendor contracts
- keys
- desks
- office budget
- air-con
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-3012.00· ESCO/ISCO 1219
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211