Automation index
How much of a Office manager’s job can AI already do?
An office inventory comes earlier. The house working without running out of paper do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Office manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#191 / 733
View rankingOffice manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Vendors, contracts and the inventory.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Facilities, the air-con and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Onboarding, keys and the desk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Budget, the extra and not overspending.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Management, the surprise and not leaving the office dark.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it works, and not running out of paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- office inventory
- facilities
- onboarding
- vendor contracts
- keys
- desks
- office budget
- air-con
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-3012.00· ESCO/ISCO 1219
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141