Automation index
How much of a Office manager’s job can AI already do?
An office inventory comes earlier. The house working without running out of paper do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Office manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#169 / 623
View rankingOffice manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Vendors, contracts and the inventory.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Facilities, the air-con and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Onboarding, keys and the desk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Budget, the extra and not overspending.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Management, the surprise and not leaving the office dark.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it works, and not running out of paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- office inventory
- facilities
- onboarding
- vendor contracts
- keys
- desks
- office budget
- air-con
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-3012.00· ESCO/ISCO 1219
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142