Automation index
How much of a Office receptionist’s job can AI already do?
A diary comes earlier. Greeting without losing the visitor in the lobby do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Office receptionist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#374 / 633
View rankingOffice receptionist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diary, visitors and the lobby.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Calls, the one who is out and the message.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Parcels, the urgent and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Access, the one without an appointment and not letting them through.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The peak, the mood and keeping calm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Greet, and not losing the visitor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- visitor diary
- lobby
- messages
- parcels
- access
- switchboard
- appointments
- sign-ins
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-4171.00· ESCO/ISCO 4226
IS WORK OVER?
Agile coach
24%
#257 / 633
View rankingAgile coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Boards, metrics and the cadence design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The real retro and the elephant in the room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Train, unblock and the manager who will not let go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scale, dependencies and fake agile.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Conflict, power and not selling extra frameworks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they stop faking it, and not inflating velocity.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- retros
- agile cadence
- unblock teams
- flow metrics
- fake agile
- agile training
- dependencies
- velocity
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1111.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421