Automation index
How much of a Office receptionist’s job can AI already do?
A diary comes earlier. Greeting without losing the visitor in the lobby do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Office receptionist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#383 / 643
View rankingOffice receptionist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diary, visitors and the lobby.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Calls, the one who is out and the message.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Parcels, the urgent and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Access, the one without an appointment and not letting them through.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The peak, the mood and keeping calm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Greet, and not losing the visitor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- visitor diary
- lobby
- messages
- parcels
- access
- switchboard
- appointments
- sign-ins
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-4171.00· ESCO/ISCO 4226
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211