Automation index
How much of a Office receptionist’s job can AI already do?
A diary comes earlier. Greeting without losing the visitor in the lobby do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Office receptionist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#374 / 633
View rankingOffice receptionist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diary, visitors and the lobby.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Calls, the one who is out and the message.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Parcels, the urgent and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Access, the one without an appointment and not letting them through.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The peak, the mood and keeping calm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Greet, and not losing the visitor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- visitor diary
- lobby
- messages
- parcels
- access
- switchboard
- appointments
- sign-ins
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-4171.00· ESCO/ISCO 4226
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142