Automation index
How much of a Olive-oil miller’s job can AI already do?
A yield comes earlier. Cold extracting without overheating do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Olive-oil miller
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#348 / 633
View rankingOlive-oil miller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Intake, yield and the mill log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Crush, malaxate and the decanter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Temperature, time and the fruitiness.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Cellar, the batch and the one that goes rancid.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The campaign, the tractor queue and not heating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Cold for real, and not painting the yield.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crush olives
- malaxation
- decanter
- fruitiness
- the campaign
- mill yield
- oil cellar
- extraction temperature
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-3092.00· ESCO/ISCO 7514
IS WORK OVER?
Process engineer
26%
#205 / 633
View rankingProcess engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
P&IDs, balances and the operating procedure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Plant, trials and the real bottleneck.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Capacity, yields and the improvement report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Start-up, shutdown and the shift that skips the SOP.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Process safety and the HAZOP that hurts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Not overloading the reactor, and signing the change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- P&IDs
- mass balances
- HAZOP
- plant start-up
- improve yields
- SOP
- bottlenecks
- process safety
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141