IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Olive-oil miller’s job can AI already do?

A yield comes earlier. Cold extracting without overheating do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Olive-oil miller

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Intake, yield and the mill log.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Crush, malaxate and the decanter.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%12%+2.2
Temperature, time and the fruitiness.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Cellar, the batch and the one that goes rancid.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The campaign, the tractor queue and not heating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
Cold for real, and not painting the yield.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • crush olives
  • malaxation
  • decanter
  • fruitiness
  • the campaign
  • mill yield
  • oil cellar
  • extraction temperature

Sources for this job· O*NET 51-3092.00· ESCO/ISCO 7514

Spanish language teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • text commentary
  • writing
  • speaking
  • spelling
  • language rubrics
  • plagiarism
  • paragraphs
  • reading

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 360Banquet manager22%
  2. 361Table official22%
  3. 362Radio host22%
  4. 364Special-education teacher22%
  5. 365Early-years teacher22%
  6. 366Primary school teacher22%