Automation index
How much of a Organ builder’s job can AI already do?
A windchest plan comes earlier. A pipe that speaks without eating the church do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Organ builder
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#540 / 653
View rankingOrgan builder
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, windchests and the wind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Pipes, voice and the one that will not speak.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Action, trackers and the one that sticks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Church, acoustics and not covering the voice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The console, the organist and not changing the stop blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That the pipe speaks, and not eating the church.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- windchests
- organ pipes
- voice
- action
- wind
- console
- stops
- church acoustics
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9071.00· ESCO/ISCO 7312
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211