Automation index

How much of a Organ builder’s job can AI already do?

A windchest plan comes earlier. A pipe that speaks without eating the church do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

19%

AI can already do 19% of this job.

#557 / 673

Organ builder

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Plan, windchests and the wind. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Pipes, voice and the one that will not speak. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	22%	8%	+1.8
Action, trackers and the one that sticks. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Church, acoustics and not covering the voice. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The console, the organist and not changing the stop blind. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	18%	+2.9
That the pipe speaks, and not eating the church. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	14%	12%	+1.7
Total	100%		19%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low