Automation index
How much of a Paid media specialist’s job can AI already do?
A media plan comes earlier. The pixel firing without burning the brand do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Paid media specialist
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#123 / 623
View rankingPaid media specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, platforms and the pixel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Creatives, frequency and audience cuts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The client, going live and the campaign that drifts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports, attribution and the last-click fight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Brand safety and inventory you cannot touch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That the pixel fires, and not burning extra CPM.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- media plan
- pixel
- frequency
- brand safety
- attribution
- creatives
- audiences
- digital inventory
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1161.00· ESCO/ISCO 2431
IS WORK OVER?
Judicial secretary
24%
#279 / 623
View rankingJudicial secretary
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Minutes, decrees and the court’s public faith.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Hearing, recording the act and the incident.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Case drive, reviews and the court.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Attachments, auctions and enforcement.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The judge, the parties and the competence clash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Faith in the act, and not leaving a procedural hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- attest in court
- decrees
- record hearings
- attachments
- auctions
- review appeals
- drive enforcement
- public faith
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-2093.00· ESCO/ISCO 3411