Automation index
How much of a Parking attendant’s job can AI already do?
A barrier comes earlier. Running the car park without wrecking the person who lost the ticket do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Parking attendant
24%
AI can already do 24% of this job.
#260 / 633
View rankingParking attendant
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Barriers, tickets and the count.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The one who cannot find the car and the one who will not pay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Incidents, the down barrier and the jam.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Shift, cash and cashing up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
The event, the full house and not blocking the street.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Run the car park, and not wrecking the lost-ticket person.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- barriers
- parking tickets
- space count
- cashing up
- stuck barrier
- events
- lost cars
- exit jam
Sources for this job· O*NET 33-9091.00· ESCO/ISCO 5414
IS WORK OVER?
Criminologist
29%
#57 / 633
View rankingCriminologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, maps and the victimisation report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Police, judges and the measure under debate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crime maps
- study reoffending
- victimisation
- evaluate programmes
- situational prevention
- criminological profiles
- reports for judges
- fieldwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632