Automation index
How much of a Parking attendant’s job can AI already do?
A barrier comes earlier. Running the car park without wrecking the person who lost the ticket do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Parking attendant
24%
AI can already do 24% of this job.
#260 / 633
View rankingParking attendant
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Barriers, tickets and the count.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The one who cannot find the car and the one who will not pay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Incidents, the down barrier and the jam.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Shift, cash and cashing up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
The event, the full house and not blocking the street.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Run the car park, and not wrecking the lost-ticket person.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- barriers
- parking tickets
- space count
- cashing up
- stuck barrier
- events
- lost cars
- exit jam
Sources for this job· O*NET 33-9091.00· ESCO/ISCO 5414
IS WORK OVER?
Talent scout
27%
#170 / 633
View rankingTalent scout
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Match, notes and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
See them live, the setting and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Data, GPS and not trusting the clip alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Network, agents and the one already promised.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The club, the rush and not inflating the average.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
See the player, and not falling for the goal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scout reports
- see live
- player GPS
- agents
- scout network
- data
- clips
- the player’s setting
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422