Automation index
How much of a Parts clerk’s job can AI already do?
An OEM code comes earlier. Giving the part that fits, not the lookalike, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Parts clerk
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#114 / 673
View rankingParts clerk
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Catalogue, equivalents and the code.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Counter, the waiting shop and the doubt.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Stock, urgent orders and the one that is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Returns, warranties and the wrong part.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The mechanic, the blurry photo and not selling blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
The one that fits, not the lookalike.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- parts catalogue
- OEM equivalents
- shop counter
- urgent orders
- returns
- part warranties
- parts stock
- part codes
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 4321
IS WORK OVER?
Spanish language teacher
22%
#391 / 673
View rankingSpanish language teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they write with sense, and not copying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- text commentary
- writing
- speaking
- spelling
- language rubrics
- plagiarism
- paragraphs
- reading
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330