Automation index
How much of a Pharmacovigilance officer’s job can AI already do?
An ADR case comes earlier. Calling it serious without staying quiet to the regulator do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#196 / 693
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262
IS WORK OVER?
Debate coach
22%
#353 / 693
View rankingDebate coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, sources and the outline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Rehearsal, the time and the one who eats the turn.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Tournament, the nerves and not losing manners.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Rebuttal, the figure and not making it up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The school, the mark and not giving the extra away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they argue, and not dropping the tweet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- debate cases
- sources
- rehearsals
- rebuttals
- tournaments
- not make up figures
- timings
- manners
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-1122.00· ESCO/ISCO 2359