Automation index
How much of a Pharmacovigilance officer’s job can AI already do?
An ADR case comes earlier. Calling it serious without staying quiet to the regulator do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#204 / 703
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262
IS WORK OVER?
Magistrate
27%
#182 / 703
View rankingMagistrate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
File, evidence and the draft.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Hearing, the witness and the one who lies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Deliberation, the bench and not yielding the vote.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgment, the ruling and not courting the headline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The appeal, the pressure and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Decide, and signing what hurts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- draft judgments
- hearings
- deliberation
- rulings
- appeals
- evidence
- the bench
- not court the headline
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1023.00· ESCO/ISCO 2612