Automation index
How much of a Pharmacovigilance officer’s job can AI already do?
An ADR case comes earlier. Calling it serious without staying quiet to the regulator do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#223 / 763
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262
IS WORK OVER?
QA automation engineer
27%
#185 / 763
View rankingQA automation engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Test, the selector and the flake.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pipeline, the green and the one that lies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Bug, the repro and not closing it blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Data, the environment and not sharing prod.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The developer, the rush and not skipping the one that fails.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Catch the bug, and not painting a lying green.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- automated tests
- selectors
- flakes
- QA pipelines
- repro
- environments
- lying green
- debug tests
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1253.00· ESCO/ISCO 2519