Automation index
How much of a Phlebotomist’s job can AI already do?
A queue and a label come earlier. Finding the vein and not sticking twice do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Phlebotomist
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#584 / 653
View rankingPhlebotomist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Bookings, labels and tubes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Puncture, draw and not haemolyse.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 8% | +1.9 |
Calm children, fear and faints.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Spin, log and send to the lab.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Waste, needlesticks and hygiene.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
Not mixing up a patient or a tube.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Bookings, labels and tubes
- Puncture, draw and not haemolyse
- Calm children, fear and faints
- Spin, log and send to the lab
- Waste, needlesticks and hygiene
- Not mixing up a patient or a tube
- flebotomista
- extractora
- phlebotomist
Sources for this job· O*NET 31-9097.00· ESCO/ISCO 5329
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131