Automation index
How much of a Phlebotomist’s job can AI already do?
A queue and a label come earlier. Finding the vein and not sticking twice do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Phlebotomist
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#584 / 653
View rankingPhlebotomist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Bookings, labels and tubes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Puncture, draw and not haemolyse.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 8% | +1.9 |
Calm children, fear and faints.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Spin, log and send to the lab.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Waste, needlesticks and hygiene.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
Not mixing up a patient or a tube.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Bookings, labels and tubes
- Puncture, draw and not haemolyse
- Calm children, fear and faints
- Spin, log and send to the lab
- Waste, needlesticks and hygiene
- Not mixing up a patient or a tube
- flebotomista
- extractora
- phlebotomist
Sources for this job· O*NET 31-9097.00· ESCO/ISCO 5329
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#187 / 653
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262