Automation index
How much of a Phlebotomist’s job can AI already do?
A queue and a label come earlier. Finding the vein and not sticking twice do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Phlebotomist
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#674 / 743
View rankingPhlebotomist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Bookings, labels and tubes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Puncture, draw and not haemolyse.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 8% | +1.9 |
Calm children, fear and faints.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Spin, log and send to the lab.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Waste, needlesticks and hygiene.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
Not mixing up a patient or a tube.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Bookings, labels and tubes
- Puncture, draw and not haemolyse
- Calm children, fear and faints
- Spin, log and send to the lab
- Waste, needlesticks and hygiene
- Not mixing up a patient or a tube
- flebotomista
- extractora
- phlebotomist
Sources for this job· O*NET 31-9097.00· ESCO/ISCO 5329
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141