Automation index
How much of a Piano tuner’s job can AI already do?
An octave protocol comes earlier. Leaving the piano in tune for the concert do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Piano tuner
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#474 / 633
View rankingPiano tuner
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnose, pinblock and the protocol.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Tune, octaves and the unison.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Regulate, dampers and the one that will not cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Voicing, hammers and the one that is hard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The concert, the hall and not leaving it flat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
In tune, and lasting the concert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tune pianos
- octaves
- unisons
- dampers
- pinblock
- voicing
- hammers
- regulate action
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-9063.00· ESCO/ISCO 7312
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 633
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165