Automation index
How much of a Piano tuner’s job can AI already do?
An octave protocol comes earlier. Leaving the piano in tune for the concert do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Piano tuner
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#488 / 653
View rankingPiano tuner
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnose, pinblock and the protocol.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Tune, octaves and the unison.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Regulate, dampers and the one that will not cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Voicing, hammers and the one that is hard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The concert, the hall and not leaving it flat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
In tune, and lasting the concert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tune pianos
- octaves
- unisons
- dampers
- pinblock
- voicing
- hammers
- regulate action
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-9063.00· ESCO/ISCO 7312
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211