Automation index
How much of a Piano tuner’s job can AI already do?
An octave protocol comes earlier. Leaving the piano in tune for the concert do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Piano tuner
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#562 / 743
View rankingPiano tuner
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnose, pinblock and the protocol.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Tune, octaves and the unison.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Regulate, dampers and the one that will not cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Voicing, hammers and the one that is hard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The concert, the hall and not leaving it flat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
In tune, and lasting the concert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tune pianos
- octaves
- unisons
- dampers
- pinblock
- voicing
- hammers
- regulate action
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-9063.00· ESCO/ISCO 7312
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141