Automation index
How much of a Politician’s job can AI already do?
A speech and a thread write. Looking a neighbourhood in the eye, striking a deal, and voting a law do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Politician
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#473 / 643
View rankingPolitician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Speeches, notes and social pieces.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 45% | +8.1 |
Legislative dossiers and template amendments.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 35% | +5.6 |
Plenaries, committees and negotiation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 10% | +1.8 |
Street, rallies and district listening.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 8% | +1.4 |
Press, debates and crisis.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Cast the vote and own the office.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 10% | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Speeches, notes and social pieces
- Plenaries, committees and negotiation
- Street, rallies and district listening
- Press, debates and crisis
- Cast the vote and own the office
- politico
- politician
- diputado
- concejal
- alcalde
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-1031.00· ESCO/ISCO 1111
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 643
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263