Automation index
How much of a Poultry farmer’s job can AI already do?
A shed protocol comes earlier. The shed not collapsing and the flock coming out whole do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Poultry farmer
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#361 / 743
View rankingPoultry farmer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Climate, ration and the mortality log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Shed, vaccines and the flock that turns.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Collection, eggs or birds and the plant.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Biosecurity, the visitor and the lorry.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The price, the integrator and not dressing deaths.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The whole flock, and not pushing density.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- poultry sheds
- mortality
- vaccinate flocks
- biosecurity
- the integrator
- egg collection
- shed climate
- density
Sources for this job· O*NET 45-2021.00· ESCO/ISCO 6122
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141